Macros
We’ve used macros like println!
throughout this book, but we haven’t fully
explored what a macro is and how it works. The term macro refers to a family
of features in Rust: declarative macros with macro_rules!
and three kinds
of procedural macros:
- Custom
#[derive]
macros that specify code added with thederive
attribute used on structs and enums - Attribute-like macros that define custom attributes usable on any item
- Function-like macros that look like function calls but operate on the tokens specified as their argument
We’ll talk about each of these in turn, but first, let’s look at why we even need macros when we already have functions.
The Difference Between Macros and Functions
Fundamentally, macros are a way of writing code that writes other code, which
is known as metaprogramming. In Appendix C, we discuss the derive
attribute, which generates an implementation of various traits for you. We’ve
also used the println!
and vec!
macros throughout the book. All of these
macros expand to produce more code than the code you’ve written manually.
Metaprogramming is useful for reducing the amount of code you have to write and maintain, which is also one of the roles of functions. However, macros have some additional powers that functions don’t.
A function signature must declare the number and type of parameters the
function has. Macros, on the other hand, can take a variable number of
parameters: we can call println!("hello")
with one argument or
println!("hello {}", name)
with two arguments. Also, macros are expanded
before the compiler interprets the meaning of the code, so a macro can, for
example, implement a trait on a given type. A function can’t, because it gets
called at runtime and a trait needs to be implemented at compile time.
The downside to implementing a macro instead of a function is that macro definitions are more complex than function definitions because you’re writing Rust code that writes Rust code. Due to this indirection, macro definitions are generally more difficult to read, understand, and maintain than function definitions.
Another important difference between macros and functions is that you must define macros or bring them into scope before you call them in a file, as opposed to functions you can define anywhere and call anywhere.
Declarative Macros with macro_rules!
for General Metaprogramming
The most widely used form of macros in Rust is the declarative macro. These
are also sometimes referred to as “macros by example,” “macro_rules!
macros,”
or just plain “macros.” At their core, declarative macros allow you to write
something similar to a Rust match
expression. As discussed in Chapter 6,
match
expressions are control structures that take an expression, compare the
resulting value of the expression to patterns, and then run the code associated
with the matching pattern. Macros also compare a value to patterns that are
associated with particular code: in this situation, the value is the literal
Rust source code passed to the macro; the patterns are compared with the
structure of that source code; and the code associated with each pattern, when
matched, replaces the code passed to the macro. This all happens during
compilation.
To define a macro, you use the macro_rules!
construct. Let’s explore how to
use macro_rules!
by looking at how the vec!
macro is defined. Chapter 8
covered how we can use the vec!
macro to create a new vector with particular
values. For example, the following macro creates a new vector containing three
integers:
#![allow(unused)] fn main() { let v: Vec<u32> = vec![1, 2, 3]; }
We could also use the vec!
macro to make a vector of two integers or a vector
of five string slices. We wouldn’t be able to use a function to do the same
because we wouldn’t know the number or type of values up front.
Listing 20-29 shows a slightly simplified definition of the vec!
macro.
Note: The actual definition of the vec!
macro in the standard library
includes code to preallocate the correct amount of memory up front. That code
is an optimization that we don’t include here to make the example simpler.
The #[macro_export]
annotation indicates that this macro should be made
available whenever the crate in which the macro is defined is brought into
scope. Without this annotation, the macro can’t be brought into scope.
We then start the macro definition with macro_rules!
and the name of the
macro we’re defining without the exclamation mark. The name, in this case
vec
, is followed by curly brackets denoting the body of the macro definition.
The structure in the vec!
body is similar to the structure of a match
expression. Here we have one arm with the pattern ( $( $x:expr ),* )
,
followed by =>
and the block of code associated with this pattern. If the
pattern matches, the associated block of code will be emitted. Given that this
is the only pattern in this macro, there is only one valid way to match; any
other pattern will result in an error. More complex macros will have more than
one arm.
Valid pattern syntax in macro definitions is different than the pattern syntax covered in Chapter 19 because macro patterns are matched against Rust code structure rather than values. Let’s walk through what the pattern pieces in Listing 20-29 mean; for the full macro pattern syntax, see the Rust Reference.
First, we use a set of parentheses to encompass the whole pattern. We use a
dollar sign ($
) to declare a variable in the macro system that will contain
the Rust code matching the pattern. The dollar sign makes it clear this is a
macro variable as opposed to a regular Rust variable. Next comes a set of
parentheses that captures values that match the pattern within the parentheses
for use in the replacement code. Within $()
is $x:expr
, which matches any
Rust expression and gives the expression the name $x
.
The comma following $()
indicates that a literal comma separator character
could optionally appear after the code that matches the code in $()
. The *
specifies that the pattern matches zero or more of whatever precedes the *
.
When we call this macro with vec![1, 2, 3];
, the $x
pattern matches three
times with the three expressions 1
, 2
, and 3
.
Now let’s look at the pattern in the body of the code associated with this arm:
temp_vec.push()
within $()*
is generated for each part that matches $()
in the pattern zero or more times depending on how many times the pattern
matches. The $x
is replaced with each expression matched. When we call this
macro with vec![1, 2, 3];
, the code generated that replaces this macro call
will be the following:
{
let mut temp_vec = Vec::new();
temp_vec.push(1);
temp_vec.push(2);
temp_vec.push(3);
temp_vec
}
We’ve defined a macro that can take any number of arguments of any type and can generate code to create a vector containing the specified elements.
To learn more about how to write macros, consult the online documentation or other resources, such as “The Little Book of Rust Macros” started by Daniel Keep and continued by Lukas Wirth.
Procedural Macros for Generating Code from Attributes
The second form of macros is the procedural macro, which acts more like a function (and is a type of procedure). Procedural macros accept some code as an input, operate on that code, and produce some code as an output rather than matching against patterns and replacing the code with other code as declarative macros do. The three kinds of procedural macros are custom derive, attribute-like, and function-like, and all work in a similar fashion.
When creating procedural macros, the definitions must reside in their own crate
with a special crate type. This is for complex technical reasons that we hope
to eliminate in the future. In Listing 20-30, we show how to define a
procedural macro, where some_attribute
is a placeholder for using a specific
macro variety.
The function that defines a procedural macro takes a TokenStream
as an input
and produces a TokenStream
as an output. The TokenStream
type is defined by
the proc_macro
crate that is included with Rust and represents a sequence of
tokens. This is the core of the macro: the source code that the macro is
operating on makes up the input TokenStream
, and the code the macro produces
is the output TokenStream
. The function also has an attribute attached to it
that specifies which kind of procedural macro we’re creating. We can have
multiple kinds of procedural macros in the same crate.
Let’s look at the different kinds of procedural macros. We’ll start with a custom derive macro and then explain the small dissimilarities that make the other forms different.
How to Write a Custom derive
Macro
Let’s create a crate named hello_macro
that defines a trait named
HelloMacro
with one associated function named hello_macro
. Rather than
making our users implement the HelloMacro
trait for each of their types,
we’ll provide a procedural macro so users can annotate their type with
#[derive(HelloMacro)]
to get a default implementation of the hello_macro
function. The default implementation will print Hello, Macro! My name is TypeName!
where TypeName
is the name of the type on which this trait has
been defined. In other words, we’ll write a crate that enables another
programmer to write code like Listing 20-31 using our crate.
This code will print Hello, Macro! My name is Pancakes!
when we’re done. The
first step is to make a new library crate, like this:
$ cargo new hello_macro --lib
Next, we’ll define the HelloMacro
trait and its associated function:
We have a trait and its function. At this point, our crate user could implement the trait to achieve the desired functionality, like so:
use hello_macro::HelloMacro;
struct Pancakes;
impl HelloMacro for Pancakes {
fn hello_macro() {
println!("Hello, Macro! My name is Pancakes!");
}
}
fn main() {
Pancakes::hello_macro();
}
However, they would need to write the implementation block for each type they
wanted to use with hello_macro
; we want to spare them from having to do this
work.
Additionally, we can’t yet provide the hello_macro
function with default
implementation that will print the name of the type the trait is implemented
on: Rust doesn’t have reflection capabilities, so it can’t look up the type’s
name at runtime. We need a macro to generate code at compile time.
The next step is to define the procedural macro. At the time of this writing,
procedural macros need to be in their own crate. Eventually, this restriction
might be lifted. The convention for structuring crates and macro crates is as
follows: for a crate named foo
, a custom derive procedural macro crate is
called foo_derive
. Let’s start a new crate called hello_macro_derive
inside
our hello_macro
project:
$ cargo new hello_macro_derive --lib
Our two crates are tightly related, so we create the procedural macro crate
within the directory of our hello_macro
crate. If we change the trait
definition in hello_macro
, we’ll have to change the implementation of the
procedural macro in hello_macro_derive
as well. The two crates will need to
be published separately, and programmers using these crates will need to add
both as dependencies and bring them both into scope. We could instead have the
hello_macro
crate use hello_macro_derive
as a dependency and re-export the
procedural macro code. However, the way we’ve structured the project makes it
possible for programmers to use hello_macro
even if they don’t want the
derive
functionality.
We need to declare the hello_macro_derive
crate as a procedural macro crate.
We’ll also need functionality from the syn
and quote
crates, as you’ll see
in a moment, so we need to add them as dependencies. Add the following to the
Cargo.toml file for hello_macro_derive
:
To start defining the procedural macro, place the code in Listing 20-32 into
your src/lib.rs file for the hello_macro_derive
crate. Note that this code
won’t compile until we add a definition for the impl_hello_macro
function.
Notice that we’ve split the code into the hello_macro_derive
function, which
is responsible for parsing the TokenStream
, and the impl_hello_macro
function, which is responsible for transforming the syntax tree: this makes
writing a procedural macro more convenient. The code in the outer function
(hello_macro_derive
in this case) will be the same for almost every
procedural macro crate you see or create. The code you specify in the body of
the inner function (impl_hello_macro
in this case) will be different
depending on your procedural macro’s purpose.
We’ve introduced three new crates: proc_macro
, syn
, and quote
. The
proc_macro
crate comes with Rust, so we didn’t need to add that to the
dependencies in Cargo.toml. The proc_macro
crate is the compiler’s API that
allows us to read and manipulate Rust code from our code.
The syn
crate parses Rust code from a string into a data structure that we
can perform operations on. The quote
crate turns syn
data structures back
into Rust code. These crates make it much simpler to parse any sort of Rust
code we might want to handle: writing a full parser for Rust code is no simple
task.
The hello_macro_derive
function will be called when a user of our library
specifies #[derive(HelloMacro)]
on a type. This is possible because we’ve
annotated the hello_macro_derive
function here with proc_macro_derive
and
specified the name HelloMacro
, which matches our trait name; this is the
convention most procedural macros follow.
The hello_macro_derive
function first converts the input
from a
TokenStream
to a data structure that we can then interpret and perform
operations on. This is where syn
comes into play. The parse
function in
syn
takes a TokenStream
and returns a DeriveInput
struct representing the
parsed Rust code. Listing 20-33 shows the relevant parts of the DeriveInput
struct we get from parsing the struct Pancakes;
string:
The fields of this struct show that the Rust code we’ve parsed is a unit struct
with the ident
(identifier, meaning the name) of Pancakes
. There are more
fields on this struct for describing all sorts of Rust code; check the syn
documentation for DeriveInput
for more information.
Soon we’ll define the impl_hello_macro
function, which is where we’ll build
the new Rust code we want to include. But before we do, note that the output
for our derive macro is also a TokenStream
. The returned TokenStream
is
added to the code that our crate users write, so when they compile their crate,
they’ll get the extra functionality that we provide in the modified
TokenStream
.
You might have noticed that we’re calling unwrap
to cause the
hello_macro_derive
function to panic if the call to the syn::parse
function
fails here. It’s necessary for our procedural macro to panic on errors because
proc_macro_derive
functions must return TokenStream
rather than Result
to
conform to the procedural macro API. We’ve simplified this example by using
unwrap
; in production code, you should provide more specific error messages
about what went wrong by using panic!
or expect
.
Now that we have the code to turn the annotated Rust code from a TokenStream
into a DeriveInput
instance, let’s generate the code that implements the
HelloMacro
trait on the annotated type, as shown in Listing 20-34.
We get an Ident
struct instance containing the name (identifier) of the
annotated type using ast.ident
. The struct in Listing 20-33 shows that when
we run the impl_hello_macro
function on the code in Listing 20-31, the
ident
we get will have the ident
field with a value of "Pancakes"
. Thus,
the name
variable in Listing 20-34 will contain an Ident
struct instance
that, when printed, will be the string "Pancakes"
, the name of the struct in
Listing 20-31.
The quote!
macro lets us define the Rust code that we want to return. The
compiler expects something different to the direct result of the quote!
macro’s execution, so we need to convert it to a TokenStream
. We do this by
calling the into
method, which consumes this intermediate representation and
returns a value of the required TokenStream
type.
The quote!
macro also provides some very cool templating mechanics: we can
enter #name
, and quote!
will replace it with the value in the variable
name
. You can even do some repetition similar to the way regular macros work.
Check out the quote
crate’s docs for a thorough introduction.
We want our procedural macro to generate an implementation of our HelloMacro
trait for the type the user annotated, which we can get by using #name
. The
trait implementation has the one function hello_macro
, whose body contains the
functionality we want to provide: printing Hello, Macro! My name is
and then
the name of the annotated type.
The stringify!
macro used here is built into Rust. It takes a Rust
expression, such as 1 + 2
, and at compile time turns the expression into a
string literal, such as "1 + 2"
. This is different than format!
or
println!
, macros which evaluate the expression and then turn the result into
a String
. There is a possibility that the #name
input might be an
expression to print literally, so we use stringify!
. Using stringify!
also
saves an allocation by converting #name
to a string literal at compile time.
At this point, cargo build
should complete successfully in both hello_macro
and hello_macro_derive
. Let’s hook up these crates to the code in Listing
20-31 to see the procedural macro in action! Create a new binary project in
your projects directory using cargo new pancakes
. We need to add
hello_macro
and hello_macro_derive
as dependencies in the pancakes
crate’s Cargo.toml. If you’re publishing your versions of hello_macro
and
hello_macro_derive
to crates.io, they would be regular
dependencies; if not, you can specify them as path
dependencies as follows:
hello_macro = { path = "../hello_macro" }
hello_macro_derive = { path = "../hello_macro/hello_macro_derive" }
Put the code in Listing 20-31 into src/main.rs, and run cargo run
: it
should print Hello, Macro! My name is Pancakes!
The implementation of the
HelloMacro
trait from the procedural macro was included without the
pancakes
crate needing to implement it; the #[derive(HelloMacro)]
added the
trait implementation.
Next, let’s explore how the other kinds of procedural macros differ from custom derive macros.
Attribute-like macros
Attribute-like macros are similar to custom derive macros, but instead of
generating code for the derive
attribute, they allow you to create new
attributes. They’re also more flexible: derive
only works for structs and
enums; attributes can be applied to other items as well, such as functions.
Here’s an example of using an attribute-like macro: say you have an attribute
named route
that annotates functions when using a web application framework:
#[route(GET, "/")]
fn index() {
This #[route]
attribute would be defined by the framework as a procedural
macro. The signature of the macro definition function would look like this:
#[proc_macro_attribute]
pub fn route(attr: TokenStream, item: TokenStream) -> TokenStream {
Here, we have two parameters of type TokenStream
. The first is for the
contents of the attribute: the GET, "/"
part. The second is the body of the
item the attribute is attached to: in this case, fn index() {}
and the rest
of the function’s body.
Other than that, attribute-like macros work the same way as custom derive
macros: you create a crate with the proc-macro
crate type and implement a
function that generates the code you want!
Function-like macros
Function-like macros define macros that look like function calls. Similarly to
macro_rules!
macros, they’re more flexible than functions; for example, they
can take an unknown number of arguments. However, macro_rules!
macros can be
defined only using the match-like syntax we discussed in the section
“Declarative Macros with macro_rules!
for General
Metaprogramming” earlier. Function-like macros take a
TokenStream
parameter and their definition manipulates that TokenStream
using Rust code as the other two types of procedural macros do. An example of a
function-like macro is an sql!
macro that might be called like so:
let sql = sql!(SELECT * FROM posts WHERE id=1);
This macro would parse the SQL statement inside it and check that it’s
syntactically correct, which is much more complex processing than a
macro_rules!
macro can do. The sql!
macro would be defined like this:
#[proc_macro]
pub fn sql(input: TokenStream) -> TokenStream {
This definition is similar to the custom derive macro’s signature: we receive the tokens that are inside the parentheses and return the code we wanted to generate.
Summary
Whew! Now you have some Rust features in your toolbox that you likely won’t use often, but you’ll know they’re available in very particular circumstances. We’ve introduced several complex topics so that when you encounter them in error message suggestions or in other peoples’ code, you’ll be able to recognize these concepts and syntax. Use this chapter as a reference to guide you to solutions.
Next, we’ll put everything we’ve discussed throughout the book into practice and do one more project!